RSS    RSS  /  Atom
Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Film
Blogroll

33 1/3 series

Ananzie: Afro Life Style

Anarchist Graffiti

Black Looks

Black Pot Mojo

Black Web 2.0

Blackadelic Pop

cocaine blunts

Donnell Alexander

GoRealer

Harry Allen

Lynne d Johnson

Mosaic literary magazine

My American Meltingpot

nat creole magazine

Nelson George

NewBlackMan

?uestlove

Shawn Loves You

Ta-Nehisi Coates

The Paris Blog

theHotness Grrrl

Zentronix: Dubwise
& Hiphopcentric

Monday, November 12, 2007

Death of the White Negro: Norman Mailer, 1923-2007

filed under:

I can’t be highfalutin about this, I really can’t do it. Truth is, I’ve never read a Norman Mailer book in my life. I bought An American Dream (a 1965 novel he wrote to satisfy alimony payments) sometime in my 20s and didn’t get past page 10. My relationship with Mailer comes from reading interviews with him over the years, occasional magazine pieces like his 1994 Esquire profile on Madonna, and his commentary on Muhammad Ali in When We Were Kings, not to mention Baldwin skewering dude in “The Black Boy Looks at the White Boy.” That last was a critical response to “The White Negro,” which I must have read once upon a time, Mailer’s earnest-yet-(naturally)-racist treatise on how black jazz musicians live more authentic lives and have more authentic orgasms or somesuch.

I eulogize Mailer because he wrote well and mastered the business art of branding himself. By this count, I owe a personal debt to Mailer (as well as Baldwin, Truman Capote, Ralph Ellison, Hunter S. Thompson, Richard Wright, Tom Wolfe, and a host of others). The Times called Mailer “transparently ambitious”; The Village Voice (which he named and helped found in 1955) said he was well known for “arrogant, despairing egocentrism.” Writers of my generation (myself included) are guilty of these traits and more. Growing up the children of television – and reality TV is a whole ’nother ballgame – nothing much matters to us unless we see it on TV, and the talking-head syndrome a lot of us have fallen prey to is directly traceable to the multitude of provocative talk show apperances writers like Mailer made over the years. (Does a writer exist nowadays if he doesn’t pontificate on Book TV? Or at least MTV?)

Mailer lived out loud, so to speak, and if I don’t know anything about his books other than 10 pages of An American Dream, I know that he once stabbed his wife with a pen-knife, picked fistfights with people with contrary opinions, ran for the mayor of New York, often drank too much and won the Pulitzer Prize, twice. If my roots as a writer stem from any school in particular, I’d have to claim the hiphop cultural critic renaissance of the 1990s. The time, place and space has been written about before (check Oliver Wang’s “Trapped in Between the Lines” or Selwyn Seyfu Hinds’s “The Source of It All,” or just see here), but I’d say that as young writers glancing over our shoulders at each other – proud, insecure, arrogant, and (sometimes) high as hell – hiphop journalists had a lot in common with Mailer, Joan Didion, Lester Bangs and anyone else you care to name who chronicled a certain American social moment with insider clarity.

I could go on and on and on, but who cares? Norman Mailer, rest in peace, you sexist, misogynist white Negro.

Comments

Joel Asa Miller at 1:08 AM on 11/13/07:

Mailer was a powerhouse and very courageous. He stood up for what’s right and took responsibility when he fucked up from what I can tell. Cause nobody is right about everything all the time. And he wrote in ways that challenged older ways of thinking.

MML at 1:11 AM on 11/13/07:

i don’t doubt all that. but though i can’t quote chapter and verse, it seems to me that mailer was guilty of a lot of female-bashing, like opposing the women’s liberation movement. like greg tate said about miles davis, on that score mailer went out like a roach.

Makkada at 4:47 PM on 11/26/07:

but it was more than his sexism. the word “racist” should go after the word misogynist and before the word white. i don’t like the way he essentialized black people and made them two-dimensional. Especially with that white negro crap in that one essay of his I read. like greg tate’s mama said: “everything but the burden.” and then they (the whit e folks) are the ones who are able to capitalize off their “white -negroness” , not us black folks. I don’t think I’m missing all that much by not reading any of his books. I might read one if I get around to it. Maybe.

MML at 3:56 PM on 11/28/07:

i feel you, makkada. being a black american artist means navigating that double-consciousness dubois talked about more than i sometimes want to. as in, appreciating what different white artists might’ve had to offer while trying to divorce those contributions from their fucked-up politics/sexism/racism. it ain’t easy.

Post a comment

Textile Help

Home